A Laboratory Study between Esthetic Restorative Materials Regarding Compression Strength

Authors

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to in vivo compare the Compression Strength of Giomer, Nano Hybrid Composite, Compomer, and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement.

Materials and Methods: The research sample consisted of 40 cylindrical discs, were prepared using a metal mold (4mm height, 5mm diameter) and made of (Giomer, Beautifil II Shofu, Japan. Nanohybrid Composite, Tetric Evo Ceram, Ivoclar Vivadent, Ellwangen, Germany. RMGIC, FUJI II LC, GC, Japan. Compomer, Compoglass, Ivoclar). The sample research is divided into four groups (10 each type), Specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 hours, Compression Strength test was then applied using test device (1mm speed) until destruction, Results were statistically analyzed by One-Way ANOVA and Bonferroni.

Results: There was statistical difference between the four groups, Evo Ceram showed the greatest Compression Strength means, then Giomer, then compomer, then RMGIC.

Author Biographies

  • Atef Abdullah, Hama University

    Associate Professor - Department of Endodontic and Operative Dentistry - Faculty of Dentistry

  • Annan al-Ghada, Hama University

    Postgraduate Student (PhD) - Department of Endodontic and Operative Dentistry - Faculty of Dentistry

Downloads

Published

2020-11-13

How to Cite

1.
A Laboratory Study between Esthetic Restorative Materials Regarding Compression Strength. Tuj-hlth [Internet]. 2020 Nov. 13 [cited 2026 Oct. 31];42(5). Available from: https://journal.latakia-univ.edu.sy/index.php/hlthscnc/article/view/10077